Let Get-It Free!

Monday, 13 January 2014

Tips Seorang Ketua


Tugas seorang ketua bukan mudah dalam membawa pasukan untuk mencapai misi sebuah organisasi.
Seorang ketua harus mengetahui apa tindakan yang harus diambil oleh mereka. Antara yang dapat saya kongsikan.
  1. Haluan : Anda harus menetapkan satu arah haluan yang jelas kepada pasukan yang anda ketuai. Haluan ini harus dicapai secara bersama.
  2. Kawal : Sentiasa pastikan pasukan dalam kawalan anda dan bukan mengongkong. Jangan biarkan ahli kumpulan anda bertindak luar kawalan sebagai pasukan. Jika ada, buat cuba dekati dengan berhemah. Jika tidak anda mungkin perlu mengeluarkannya dan ia mungkin menjadi barah.
  3. Bimbing : Anda harus bersedia membimbing ahli kumpulan anda. Tidak semua orang mempunyai kelebihan yang sama. Dengan bimbingan ini akan memaparkan ciri kepimpinan anda.
  4. Kenali : Anda harus mengenali setiap ahli kumpulan anda. Kekuatan dan kelemahan supaya anda dapat letakan mereka di posisi yang tepat. Anda juga dapat membantu dari segi kelemahan yang mereka ada.
  5. Strategi : Anda harus mempunyai pecaturan dalam mencapai haluan. Susun mereka melalui kelebihan. Bina sistem supaya ia mampu bergerak walau dalam kurang penyeliaan.
  6. Kepercayaan : Anda harus bina kepercayaan dan menghormati kepercayaan itu. Jangan sesekali khianatinya. Jadikan diri anda orang paling dipercayai dalam pasukan.
  7. Hormati : Anda harus menghormati kumpulan anda dan tidak melampaui batasan sebagai seorang ketua.
  8. Pasukan : Terapkan nilai berpasukan yang tinggi dan bertindak atas dasar berpasukan. Pastikan tiada yang lebih penting dan besar dari pasukan. Bertindak bagi kepentingan pasukan dan pengaruh pasukan.
  9. Peka : Peka terhadap setiap tingkah laku. Tidak kira sama ada ahli anda sakit atau demoralize. 
  10. Rapat: Anda harus rapat dengan ahli anda, agak timbul perasaan kesetian antara satu dan lain.

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Tunjuk Ajar Dalam Kritikan

Adalah sukar untuk kita menerima kritikan tetapi adakah kita harus menjadi tewas bila dikritik. Bila kita menafsirkan kritikan tadi sebagai cubaan menjatuhkan kita dari pihak pengkritik ia langsung tidak menjayakan kita. Bahkan ia telah menimbulkan perasaan tidak senang antara kita dengan pihak pengkritik (Terutamanya bila boss mengkritik). Lebih teruk apabila kita tidak mahu bekerjasama lagi dimasa akan datang. Kita juga tidak tahu niat sebenar mereka dan biarkan mereka yang mengetahuinya.

6 Keadah menerima kritikan:

1. Ketahui kecenderungan anda

Kenali diri kita cenderungan kearah yang bagaimana. Adakah kita jenis yang menidakan sesuatu pada permulaan dan menilainya pada waktu tidurnya. Ambil perhatian terhadap diri anda bagi mencari penyelesaian yang bernilai terhadap masa hadapan.

2. Menguraikan "apa" dari "siapa"

Mulakan dengan mengurai isi penyampaian dari siapa yang penyampaikan. Ia membantu kita menyerap apa yang diperkatakan dahulu sebelum sampai dari siapa. Ia dapat mengelakkan penidakan dari apa yang diperkatakan. Maklumlah kita terlalu personal dan menidakkan semua bila kita tidak suka seseorang.
3. Susun ke arah bimbingan

Aturkan semua kritikan kepada bimbingan. Dengan ini kita memikirkan sesuatu kearah positif.

4. Membongkar maklum balas

Kerap kali maklum balas tidak datang dengan cepat. Lakukan sedikit penyelidikan terhadap maklum balas dari penyampai agar kita mengetahui isi yang cuba disampaikan sebelum ini. Awas kadangkala memang ada yang bertindak cuba menjatuhkan anda, bijak tangani isu begini.

5. Minta hanya satu perkara

Minta sesuatu pandangan yang tergantung dari pihak yang mengkritik anda. Ia mengundang jawapan yang menyakitkan dengan persoalan yang ditumbulkan. Contohnya, " Adakah anda mempunyai sebarang maklum balas untuk saya? Tetapi gunakan "Apakah satu perkara yang anda lihat saya lakukan telah membelenggu kegagalan?" Ia membantu kita keluar dari masalah dari pihak yang mengkritik.

6. Libatkan diri dalam percubaan kecil


Selepas anda telah bekerja dan berusaha mendapatkan dan memahami maklum balas, ia boleh menjadi sukar untuk membezakan antara nasihat yang akan membantu anda dan sebaliknya. Saya mencadangkan lakukan  uji kaji kecil untuk mengetahui. Walaupun anda mungkin ragu-ragu bahawa cadangan akan menjadi berguna. Tetapi ia bernilai untuk mencuba dari gagal tidak melakukan apa-apa.












Sunday, 5 January 2014

Formula of Sir Alex Ferguson

1. Start with the Foundation
Upon his arrival at Manchester, in 1986, Ferguson set about creating a structure for the long term by modernizing United’s youth program. He established two “centers of excellence” for promising players as young as nine and recruited a number of scouts, urging them to bring him the top young talent. The best-known of his early signings was David Beckham. The most important was probably Ryan Giggs, whom Ferguson noticed as a skinny 13-year-old in 1986 and who went on to become the most decorated British footballer of all time. At 39, Giggs is still a United regular. The longtime stars Paul Scholes and Gary Neville were also among Ferguson’s early youth program investments. Together with Giggs and Beckham, they formed the core of the great United teams of the late 1990s and early 2000s, which Ferguson credits with shaping the club’s modern identity.
It was a big bet on young talent, and at a time when the prevailing wisdom was, as one respected television commentator put it, “You can’t win anything with kids.” Ferguson approached the process systematically. He talks about the difference between building a team, which is what most managers concentrate on, and building a club.
Sir Alex Ferguson: From the moment I got to Manchester United, I thought of only one thing: building a football club. I wanted to build right from the bottom. That was in order to create fluency and a continuity of supply to the first team. With this approach, the players all grow up together, producing a bond that, in turn, creates a spirit.
When I arrived, only one player on the first team was under 24. Can you imagine that, for a club like Manchester United? I knew that a focus on youth would fit the club’s history, and my earlier coaching experience told me that winning with young players could be done and that I was good at working with them. So I had the confidence and conviction that if United was going to mean anything again, rebuilding the youth structure was crucial. You could say it was brave, but fortune favors the brave.
The first thought of 99% of newly appointed managers is to make sure they win—to survive. So they bring experienced players in. That’s simply because we’re in a results-driven industry. At some clubs, you need only to lose three games in a row, and you’re fired. In today’s football world, with a new breed of directors and owners, I am not sure any club would have the patience to wait for a manager to build a team over a four-year period.
Winning a game is only a short-term gain—you can lose the next game. Building a club brings stability and consistency. You don’t ever want to take your eyes off the first team, but our youth development efforts ended up leading to our many successes in the 1990s and early 2000s. The young players really became the spirit of the club.
I always take great pride in seeing younger players develop. The job of a manager, like that of a teacher, is to inspire people to be better. Give them better technical skills, make them winners, make them better people, and they can go anywhere in life. When you give young people a chance, you not only create a longer life span for the team, you also create loyalty. They will always remember that you were the manager who gave them their first opportunity. Once they know you are batting for them, they will accept your way. You’re really fostering a sense of family. If you give young people your attention and an opportunity to succeed, it is amazing how much they will surprise you.
2. Dare to Rebuild Your Team
Even in times of great success, Ferguson worked to rebuild his team. He is credited with assembling five distinct league-winning squads during his time at the club and continuing to win trophies all the while. His decisions were driven by a keen sense of where his team stood in the cycle of rebuilding and by a similarly keen sense of players’ life cycles—how much value the players were bringing to the team at any point in time. Managing the talent development process inevitably involved cutting players, including loyal veterans to whom Ferguson had a personal attachment. “He’s never really looking at this moment, he’s always looking into the future,” Ryan Giggs told us. “Knowing what needs strengthening and what needs refreshing—he’s got that knack.”
Our analysis of a decade’s worth of player transfer data revealed Ferguson to be a uniquely effective “portfolio manager” of talent. He is strategic, rational, and systematic. In the past decade, during which Manchester United won the English league five times, the club spent less on incoming transfers than its rivals Chelsea, Manchester City, and Liverpool did. One reason was a continued commitment to young players: Those under 25 constituted a far higher share of United’s incoming transfers than of its competitors’. And because United was willing to sell players who still had good years ahead of them, it made more money from outgoing transfers than most of its rivals did—so the betting on promising talent could continue. Many of those bets were made on very young players on the cusp of superstardom. (Ferguson did occasionally shell out top money for established superstars, such as the Dutch striker Robin van Persie, bought for $35 million at the start of the 2012–2013 season, when he was 29.) Young players were given the time and conditions to succeed, most older players were sold to other teams while they were still valuable properties, and a few top veterans were kept around to lend continuity and carry the culture of the club forward.
Ferguson: We identified three levels of players: those 30 and older, those roughly 23 to 30, and the younger ones coming in. The idea was that the younger players were developing and would meet the standards that the older ones had set. Although I was always trying to disprove it, I believe that the cycle of a successful team lasts maybe four years, and then some change is needed. So we tried to visualize the team three or four years ahead and make decisions accordingly. Because I was at United for such a long time, I could afford to plan ahead—no one expected me to go anywhere. I was very fortunate in that respect.

The goal was to evolve gradually, moving older players out and younger players in. It was mainly about two things: First, who did we have coming through and where did we see them in three years’ time, and second, were there signs that existing players were getting older? Some players can go on for a long time, like Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes, and Rio Ferdinand, but age matters. The hardest thing is to let go of a player who has been a great guy—but all the evidence is on the field. If you see the change, the deterioration, you have to ask yourself what things are going to be like two years ahead.
3. Set High Standards—and Hold Everyone to Them
Ferguson speaks passionately about wanting to instill values in his players. More than giving them technical skills, he wanted to inspire them to strive to do better and to never give up—in other words, to make them winners.
His intense desire to win stemmed in part from his own experiences as a player. After success at several small Scottish clubs, he signed with a top club, Rangers—the team he had supported as a boy—but soon fell out of favor with the new manager. He left Rangers three years later with only a Scottish Cup Final runner-up’s medal to show for his time there. “The adversity gave me a sense of determination that has shaped my life,” he told us. “I made up my mind that I would never give in.”
Ferguson looked for the same attitude in his players. He recruited what he calls “bad losers” and demanded that they work extremely hard. Over the years this attitude became contagious—players didn’t accept teammates’ not giving it their all. The biggest stars were no exception.
Ferguson: Everything we did was about maintaining the standards we had set as a football club—this applied to all my team building and all my team preparation, motivational talks, and tactical talks. For example, we never allowed a bad training session. What you see in training manifests itself on the game field. So every training session was about quality. We didn’t allow a lack of focus. It was about intensity, concentration, speed—a high level of performance. That, we hoped, made our players improve with each session.
I had to lift players’ expectations. They should never give in. I said that to them all the time: “If you give in once, you’ll give in twice.” And the work ethic and energy I had seemed to spread throughout the club. I used to be the first to arrive in the morning. In my later years, a lot of my staff members would already be there when I got in at 7 AM. I think they understood why I came in early—they knew there was a job to be done. There was a feeling that “if he can do it, then I can do it.”
I constantly told my squad that working hard all your life is a talent. But I expected even more from the star players. I expected them to work even harder. I said, “You’ve got to show that you are the top players.” And they did. That’s why they are star players—they are prepared to work harder. Superstars with egos are not the problem some people may think. They need to be winners, because that massages their egos, so they will do what it takes to win. I used to see [Cristiano] Ronaldo [one of the world’s top forwards, who now plays for Real Madrid], Beckham, Giggs, Scholes, and others out there practicing for hours. I’d have to chase them in. I’d be banging on the window saying, “We’ve got a game on Saturday.” But they wanted the time to practice. They realized that being a Manchester United player is not an easy job.
4. Never, Ever Cede Control
“You can’t ever lose control—not when you are dealing with 30 top professionals who are all millionaires,” Ferguson told us. “And if any players want to take me on, to challenge my authority and control, I deal with them.” An important part of maintaining high standards across the board was Ferguson’s willingness to respond forcefully when players violated those standards. If they got into trouble, they were fined. And if they stepped out of line in a way that could undermine the team’s performance, Ferguson let them go. In 2005, when longtime captain Roy Keane publicly criticized his teammates, his contract was terminated. The following year, when United’s leading scorer at the time, Ruud van Nistelrooy, became openly disgruntled over several benchings, he was promptly sold to Real Madrid.
Responding forcefully is only part of the story here. Responding quickly, before situations get out of hand, may be equally important to maintaining control.
Ferguson: If the day came that the manager of Manchester United was controlled by the players—in other words, if the players decided how the training should be, what days they should have off, what the discipline should be, and what the tactics should be—then Manchester United would not be the Manchester United we know. Before I came to United, I told myself I wasn’t going to allow anyone to be stronger than I was. Your personality has to be bigger than theirs. That is vital.
There are occasions when you have to ask yourself whether certain players are affecting the dressing-room atmosphere, the performance of the team, and your control of the players and staff. If they are, you have to cut the cord. There is absolutely no other way. It doesn’t matter if the person is the best player in the world. The long-term view of the club is more important than any individual, and the manager has to be the most important one in the club.
Some English clubs have changed managers so many times that it creates power for the players in the dressing room. That is very dangerous. If the coach has no control, he will not last. You have to achieve a position of comprehensive control. Players must recognize that as the manager, you have the status to control events. You can complicate your life in many ways by asking, “Oh, I wonder if the players like me?” If I did my job well, the players would respect me, and that’s all you need.
I tended to act quickly when I saw a player become a negative influence. Some might say I acted impulsively, but I think it was critical that I made up my mind quickly. Why should I have gone to bed with doubts? I would wake up the next day and take the necessary steps to maintain discipline. It’s important to have confidence in yourself to make a decision and to move on once you have. It’s not about looking for adversity or for opportunities to prove power; it’s about having control and being authoritative when issues do arise.
5. Match the Message to the Moment
When it came to communicating decisions to his players, Ferguson—perhaps surprisingly for a manager with a reputation for being tough and demanding—worked hard to tailor his words to the situation.
When he had to tell a player who might have been expecting to start that he wouldn’t be starting, he would approach it as a delicate assignment. “I do it privately,” he told us. “It’s not easy. I say, ‘Look, I might be making a mistake here’—I always say that—‘but I think this is the best team for today.’ I try to give them a bit of confidence, telling them that it is only tactical and that bigger games are coming up.”
During training sessions in the run-up to games, Ferguson and his assistant coaches emphasized the positives. And although the media often portrayed him as favoring ferocious halftime and postgame talks, in fact he varied his approach. “You can’t always come in shouting and screaming,” he told us. “That doesn’t work.” The former player Andy Cole described it this way: “If you lose and Sir Alex believes you gave your best, it’s not a problem. But if you lose [in a] limp way...then mind your ears!”
Ferguson: No one likes to be criticized. Few people get better with criticism; most respond to encouragement instead. So I tried to give encouragement when I could. For a player—for any human being—there is nothing better than hearing “Well done.” Those are the two best words ever invented. You don’t need to use superlatives.
At the same time, in the dressing room, you need to point out mistakes when players don’t meet expectations. That is when reprimands are important. I would do it right after the game. I wouldn’t wait until Monday. I’d do it, and it was finished. I was on to the next match. There is no point in criticizing a player forever.
Generally, my pregame talks were about our expectations, the players’ belief in themselves, and their trust in one another. I liked to refer to a working-class principle. Not all players come from a working-class background, but maybe their fathers do, or their grandfathers, and I found it useful to remind players how far they have come. I would tell them that having a work ethic is very important. It seemed to enhance their pride. I would remind them that it is trust in one another, not letting their mates down, that helps build the character of a team.
In halftime talks, you have maybe eight minutes to deliver your message, so it is vital to use the time well. Everything is easier when you are winning: You can talk about concentrating, not getting complacent, and the small things you can address. But when you are losing, you have to make an impact. I liked to focus on our own team and our own strengths, but you have to correct why you are losing.
In our training sessions, we tried to build a football team with superb athletes who were smart tactically. If you are too soft in your approach, you won’t be able to achieve that. Fear has to come into it. But you can be too hard; if players are fearful all the time, they won’t perform well either. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to see that showing your anger all the time doesn’t work. You have to pick your moments. As a manager, you play different roles at different times. Sometimes you have to be a doctor, or a teacher, or a father.
6. Prepare to Win
Ferguson’s teams had a knack for pulling out victories in the late stages of games. Our analysis of game results shows that over 10 recent seasons, United had a better record when tied at halftime and when tied with 15 minutes left to play than any other club in the English league. Inspirational halftime talks and the right tactical changes during the game undoubtedly had something to do with those wins, but they may not be the full story.
When their teams are behind late in the game, many managers will direct players to move forward, encouraging them to attack. Ferguson was both unusually aggressive and unusually systematic about his approach. He prepared his team to win. He had players regularly practice how they should play if a goal was needed with 10, five, or three minutes remaining. “We practice for when the going gets tough, so we know what it takes to be successful in those situations,” one of United’s assistant coaches told us.
United practice sessions focused on repetition of skills and tactics. “We look at the training sessions as opportunities to learn and improve,” Ferguson said. “Sometimes the players might think, ‘Here we go again,’ but it helps us win.” There appears to be more to this approach than just the common belief that winning teams are rooted in habits—that they can execute certain plays almost automatically. There is also an underlying signal that you are never quite satisfied with where you are and are constantly looking for ways to improve. This is how Ferguson put it: “The message is simple: We cannot sit still at this club.”
Ferguson: Winning is in my nature. I’ve set my standards over such a long period of time that there is no other option for me—I have to win. I expected to win every time we went out there. Even if five of the most important players were injured, I expected to win. Other teams get into a huddle before the start of a match, but I did not do that with my team. Once we stepped onto the pitch before a game, I was confident that the players were prepared and ready to play, because everything had been done before they walked out onto the pitch.
I am a gambler—a risk taker—and you can see that in how we played in the late stages of matches. If we were down at halftime, the message was simple: Don’t panic. Just concentrate on getting the task done. If we were still down—say, 1–2—with 15 minutes to go, I was ready to take more risks. I was perfectly happy to lose 1–3 if it meant we’d given ourselves a good chance to draw or to win. So in those last 15 minutes, we’d go for it. We’d put in an extra attacking player and worry less about defense. We knew that if we ended up winning 3–2, it would be a fantastic feeling. And if we lost 1–3, we’d been losing anyway.
Being positive and adventurous and taking risks—that was our style. We were there to win the game. Our supporters understood that, and they got behind it. It was a wonderful feeling, you know, to see us go for it in those last 15 minutes. A bombardment in the box, bodies everywhere, players putting up a real fight. Of course, you can lose on the counterattack, but the joy of winning when you thought you were beaten is fantastic.
I think all my teams had perseverance—they never gave in. So I didn’t really need to worry about getting that message across. It’s a fantastic characteristic to have, and it is amazing to see what can happen in the dying seconds of a match.
7. Rely on the Power of Observation
Ferguson started out as a manager at the small Scottish club East Stirlingshire in 1974, when he was 32. He was not much older than some of his players and was very hands-on. As he moved up—to St. Mirren and Aberdeen, in Scotland, and then, after spectacular success at Aberdeen, to Manchester United—he increasingly delegated the training sessions to his assistant coaches. But he was always present, and he watched. The switch from coaching to observing, he told us, allowed him to better evaluate the players and their performances. “As a coach on the field, you don’t see everything,” he noted. A regular observer, however, can spot changes in training patterns, energy levels, and work rates.
The key is to delegate the direct supervision to others and trust them to do their jobs, allowing the manager to truly observe.
Ferguson: Observation is the final part of my management structure. When I started as a coach, I relied on several basics: that I could play the game well, that I understood the technical skills needed to succeed at the highest level, that I could coach players, and that I had the ability to make decisions. One afternoon at Aberdeen I had a conversation with my assistant manager while we were having a cup of tea. He said, “I don’t know why you brought me here.” I said, “What are you talking about?” and he replied, “I don’t do anything. I work with the youth team, but I’m here to assist you with the training and with picking the team. That’s the assistant manager’s job.” And another coach said, “I think he’s right, boss,” and pointed out that I could benefit from not always having to lead the training. At first I said, “No, no, no,” but I thought it over for a few days and then said, “I’ll give it a try. No promises.” Deep down I knew he was right. So I delegated the training to him, and it was the best thing I ever did.
It didn’t take away my control. My presence and ability to supervise were always there, and what you can pick up by watching is incredibly valuable. Once I stepped out of the bubble, I became more aware of a range of details, and my performance level jumped. Seeing a change in a player’s habits or a sudden dip in his enthusiasm allowed me to go further with him: Is it family problems? Is he struggling financially? Is he tired? What kind of mood is he in? Sometimes I could even tell that a player was injured when he thought he was fine.
I don’t think many people fully understand the value of observing. I came to see observation as a critical part of my management skills. The ability to see things is key—or, more specifically, the ability to see things you don’t expect to see.
8. Never Stop Adapting
In Ferguson’s quarter of a century at United, the world of football changed dramatically, from the financial stakes involved (with both positive and negative consequences) to the science behind what makes players better. Responding to change is never easy, and it is perhaps even harder when one is on top for so long. Yet evidence of Ferguson’s willingness to change is everywhere. As David Gill described it to me, Ferguson has “demonstrated a tremendous capacity to adapt as the game has changed.”
In the mid-1990s, Ferguson became the first manager to field teams with a large number of young players in the relatively unprestigious League Cup—a practice that initially caused outrage but now is common among Premier League clubs (the Premier League consists of the country’s top 20 teams). He was also the first to let four top center forwards spend a season battling for two positions on his roster, a strategy that many outsiders deemed unmanageable but that was key to the great 1998–1999 season, in which United won the Treble: the Premier League, the FA (Football Association) Cup, and the UEFA (Union of European Football Associations) Champions League.
Off the field, Ferguson greatly expanded his backroom staff and appointed a team of sports scientists to support the coaches. Following their suggestions, he installed Vitamin D booths in the players’ dressing room in order to compensate for the lack of sunlight in Manchester, and championed the use of vests fitted with GPS sensors that allow an analysis of performance just 20 minutes after a training session. Ferguson was the first coach to employ an optometrist for his players. United also hired a yoga instructor to work with players twice a week and recently unveiled a state-of-the-art medical facility at its training ground so that all procedures short of surgery can be handled on-site—ensuring a level of discretion impossible in a public hospital, where details about a player’s condition are invariably leaked to the press.
Ferguson: When I started, there were no agents, and although games were televised, the media did not elevate players to the level of film stars and constantly look for new stories about them. Stadiums have improved, pitches are in perfect condition now, and sports science has a strong influence on how we prepare for the season. Owners from Russia, the Middle East, and other regions have poured a lot of money into the game and are putting pressure on managers. And players have led more-sheltered lives, so they are much more fragile than players were 25 years ago.
One of the things I’ve done well over the years is manage change. I believe that you control change by accepting it. That also means having confidence in the people you hire. The minute staff members are employed, you have to trust that they are doing their jobs. If you micromanage and tell people what to do, there is no point in hiring them. The most important thing is to not stagnate. I said to David Gill a few years ago, “The only way we can keep players at Manchester United is if we have the best training ground in Europe.” That is when we kick-started the medical center. We can’t sit still.
Most people with my kind of track record don’t look to change. But I always felt I couldn’t afford not to change. We had to be successful—there was no other option for me—and I would explore any means of improving. I continued to work hard. I treated every success as my first. My job was to give us the best possible chance of winning. That is what drove me.
By: Anita Elberse is the Lincoln Filene Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School

Friday, 3 January 2014

Boss Atau Leader


Aku memikirkan " Great Leader Inspire" oleh Patrick Dixon, tidak pasti adakah ungkapan asal milik siapa.

Bila kita lihat gambar yang di sebelah kanan sudah pasti kita ingin menjadi "Leader" dan bukannya "Boss".

Pastinya tidak semua mampu menjadi "leader" mahupun "boss" kerana organisasi akan lumpuh apabila semua orang ingin menjadi ketua atau semua orang menjadi pengikut.

Aku lebih tertarik dengan ungkapan " great leader inspire".
  1. Siapa "inspire". 
  2. Apa itu "inspire".
  3. Dimanakah harus "inspire".
  4. Bilakah "inspire" perlu.
  5. Kenapa perlu "inspire".
  6. Bagaimana untuk "inspire".
Pasti ramaikan akan berkata begini bila diajukan soal inspire.
" Buat apa nak inspire orang"
" Gila glamour"
"Macam bagus sangat nak Inspire"
Dan banyak lagilah.

Tetapi ramai menyedari bahawa "inspire" harus dalam leader.

Contoh, kita fikirkan di tempat kerja kita.
Bagaimana ketua kita? Inspire tak ? Jawapan ramai yang TAK berbanding YA.
Bagaimana kawan kita?
Bagaimana JKKK?
Bagaimana wakil rakyat?
Bagaimana ketua jabatan?
Bagaimana Menteri or Perdana Menteri negara jiran? Auto terfikir negara sendiri.

Jawapannya sama-sama kita renungkan.

Terfikir bagaimana ingin menyakinkan semua orang tentang mereka mampu menjadi Inspire.

Monday, 30 December 2013

Conflict Strategies for Nice People


Do you value friendly relations with your colleagues? Are you proud of being a nice person who would never pick a fight?  Unfortunately, you might be just as responsible for group dysfunction  as your more combative team members. That’s because it’s a problem when you shy away from open, healthy conflict about the issues. If you think you’re “taking one for the team” by not rocking the boat, you’re deluding  yourself.

Teams need conflict to function effectively.  Conflict allows the team to come to terms with difficult situations, to synthesize diverse  perspectives, and to make sure solutions are well thought-out .  Conflict is uncomfortable, but it is the source of true innovation and also a critical process in identifying and mitigating  risks.

Still, I meet people every day who admit that they aren’t comfortable with conflict.  They worry that disagreeing might hurt someone’s feelings or disrupt  harmonious team dynamics. They fret  that their perspective isn’t as valid as someone else’s, so they hold back.

Sure, pulling your punches might help you maintain your self-image as a nice person, but you do so at the cost of getting your alternative perspective on the table; at the cost of challenging faulty assumptions; and at the cost of highlighting hidden risks.  That’s a high cost to pay for nice.

To overcome these problems, we need a new definition of nice. In this version of nice, you surface your differences of opinion, you discuss the uncomfortable issues, and you put things on the table where they can help your team move forward.

The secret of having healthy conflict and maintaining your self-image as a nice person is all in the mindset and the delivery.

To start shifting your mindset, think about your value to the team not in how often you agree, but in how often you add unique value.  If all you’re doing is agreeing with your teammates, you’re redundant .  So start by telling yourself “it’s my obligation to bring a different perspective than what others are bringing.” Grade yourself on how much value you bring on a topic.

Here are a few tips on improving your delivery:
1. Use “and,” not “but.” When you need to disagree with someone, express your contrary opinion as an “and.” It’s not necessary for someone else to be wrong for you to be right.  When you are surprised to hear something a teammate has said, don’t try to trump  it, just add your reality. “You think we need to leave room in the budget for a customer event and I’m concerned that we need that money for employee training. What are our options?”   This will engage your teammates in problem solving, which is inherently  collaborative instead of combative.

2. Use hypotheticals . When someone disagrees with you, don’t take them head on—being contradicted doesn’t feel very good.  Instead, a useful tactic is to ask about hypothetical situations and to get them imagining. (Imagining is the opposite of defending, so it gets the brain out of a rut.) If you are meeting resistance to your ideas, try asking your teammates to imagine a different scenario. “I hear your concern about getting the right sales people to pull off this campaign. If we could get the right people…what could the campaign look like?

3. Ask about the impact. Directing open-ended questions at your teammate is also useful.  If you are concerned about a proposed course of action, ask your teammates to think through the impact of implementing their plan. “Ok, we’re contemplating  launching this product to only our U.S. customers. How is that going to land with our two big customers in Latin America?”  This approach feels much less aggressive than saying “Our Latin American customers will be angry.”  Anytime you can demonstrate that you’re open to ideas and curious about the right approach, it will open up the discussion (and you’ll preserve your reputation as a nice person).

4. Discuss the underlying  issue. Many conflicts on a team spiral out of control because the parties involved aren’t on the same page.  If you disagree with a proposed course of action, instead of complaining about the solution, start by trying to understand what’s behind the suggestion. If you understand the reasoning, you might be able to find another way to accomplish the same goal. “I’m surprised you suggested we release the sales figures to the whole team. What is your goal in doing that?” Often conflict arises when one person tries to solve a problem without giving sufficient thought to the options or the impact of those actions.  If you agree that the problem they are trying to solve is important, you will have common ground from which to start sleuthing toward answers.

5. Ask for help. Another tactic for “nice conflict” is to be mildly self-deprecating and to own the misunderstanding.  If something is really surprising to you (e.g., you can’t believe anyone would propose anything so crazy), say so.  “I’m missing something here. Tell me how this will address our sales gap for Q1.” If the person’s idea really doesn’t hold water, a series of genuine, open questions that come from a position of helping you understand will likely provide other teammates with the chance to help steer  the plan in a different direction.

Conflict — presenting a different point of view even when it is uncomfortable — is critical to team effectiveness. Diversity  of thinking on a team is the source of innovation and growth. It is also the path to identifying and mitigating risks. If you find yourself shying away from conflict, use one of these techniques to make it a little easier.

The alternative is withholding your concerns, taking them up outside of the team, and slowly eroding trust and credibility.  That’s not nice at all.

Sunday, 1 September 2013

The right to be racist

It is awkward to write controversial issues on the 56th of National Independence day. Most of us are prejudice on each other either in the basis of religion, race or what so ever.

It is great to denied, but the truth will rise waiting the time to move. We are claiming the GLC are dominance by BUMI and it is truth. Even the NON BUMI can’t deny the majority of the company own by them on the same situation. What is the problem? Why these situations happen?

Politician working hard to find the solution but it is clear the answer is the system not working. Our EDUCATION was separating us to be uniting. We are facing these issues since before independence until now. To be honest, it bitter but the reality people not realizes this situation.

Even US until now face the same thing, we able to hide under the carpet but the end? When the end of life in this kind of hypocrite? How the next generation will suffer with our action? You are Malay, You are Chinese, You are Indian and you are Sabah and Sarawak.


We only think on the side of us, we never truth to the situation of Malaysia. We are trying to use OSA to cover the problem without settling the issues. We can maintain our shape until it leak. We are acting harmony in the fake mask of truly Malaysia. 

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Bersyukurlah

  1. Aku lepasan universiti, berijazah kejuruteraan nampaknya gah tetapi gajiku hanya 2000 tolak simpanan hari tua RM1,760.
  2. Aku baru memulakan kehidupan, perlukan kereta untuk berkerja jadilah walaupun hanya VIVA. Mudah untuk memilikinya, tunjuk ijazah dan tawaran kerja dapatlah kereta. Bayaran pun murah RM 400 sebulan selama 108 bulan.
  3. Dahulu aku belajar guna PTPTN, jadi aku bayar RM 200 sebulan.Jangan tak bayar, berdosa.
  4. Aku tinggal menyewa, bayaran termasuk semua kelengkapan kira2 RM 250 sahaja. Ingat nk beli rumah selepas ini.
  5. Kemudian ku kirim wang untuk ibu yang jauh dikampung, tidak banyak RM 200 jadilah meringgankan beban.
  6. Ulang alik kerja, isi minyak kira2 RM 150 termasuklah jalan2 pergi shopping tingkap.
  7. Makan minum kat kedai mamak semua kira2 RM 300.
  8. Total semua RM 1,500 dapatlah aku simpan RM 260. Sikit2 lama2 jadi bukit. Betul x?
  9. Setahun simpanan aku RM 3,120 simpanlah aku untuk berumahtangga.
  10. Genap setahun menyimpan, kereta pulak mintak insuran nasib tidak banyak RM 1,000. Adalah aku RM 2,120.
  11. Hantaran 10,000 tidaklah banyak, standard sekarang. jadi kira2 5 tahun lagi dapatlah aku kahwin.
  12. Nasiblah calon isteri setia, menantilah dia selama 5 tahun kalau x jadi merana.
  13. Kerja ku dikilang sahaja, kasihan lagi kepada operator gaji RM 900 je masuk OT semua RM 2200-2300. Itulah kau nak jadi ENGINEER.

Monday, 6 May 2013

Saya berdiri diatas pendirian saya


Assalammualaikum,

Penulis saya kali ini berkisar dengan PRU-13 dan merupakan PRU ke 4 saya lalui dengan penuh kefahaman tetapi yang pertama sebagai pemilih rasmi.

Secara terang saya inginkan pembaharuan politik sejak saya berusia 11 tahun dan kini hampir menjenggah usia 26 tahun. 15 tahun saya menganalisis politik sehingga kini, dan 4 kali berturut-turut saya merasai kegagalan dalam PRU sebagai penyokong.

Pegangan politik saya bukanlah ikut-ikutan dan juga bukan bawaan keluarga tetapi ianya penepati pemikiran yang dibenihi oleh pembacaan dan pemerhatian saya lalui.

Kegagalan menerajui Putrajaya bukanlah perkara baru, bahkan ia membuatkan saya semakin faham ada perbezaan jelas antara pengundi Bandar dan luar Bandar.

Kecelikan politik bukan milik semua orang apatah lagi keghairahan seperti saya ini berbeza sekali dengan teman seusia. Dahulu rakan-rakan saya tidak tahu politik tetapi sekarang mereka lebih mengetahui dahulu dari saya. Harapnya mereka mengundi dan mengerti bahawa masej yang ingin disampaikan bahawa Malaysia mampu ditadbir lebih baik dari Kerajaan Barisan Nasional berbekas dihati.

Cemohan dari penyokong ikut-ikutan tidak membekas bahkan menjadi pemangkin bahawa suatu hari nanti mereka akan sedar mengapa saya menentang kerajaan sedia ada.
Selamat Maju jaya.



Monday, 18 February 2013

Hanya Kerana Allah

Tegang dengan Isu Kalimah Allah dalam PR dalam tidak seberapa ketika PRU-13 bertandang.

DAP tegas bahawa PR harus akur dengan persetujuan 3 pemimpin utama PR.

Majlis Ulama Pas yang bertegas bahawa Kalimah Allah dalam versi bahasa Melayu tidak harus dibenarkan.

DAP dakwa keputusan Majlis Ulama bukan keputusan majoriti.

Persetujuan 3 pemimpin PR juga bukan keputusan Majoriti. (Pada pandangan saya)

Janji Pakatan Rakyat

  • PTPTN mansuh
  • Free Education 
  • Harga Minyak Turun
  • Harga kereta Turun
  • Banteras Rasuah
Banyak lagi janji-janji yang terukir, seiring dengan kehendak Allah akan ku turuti.

Bila sebut kalimah Allah dalam bible versi Melayu, itu secara terang ada agenda sulit untuk mengelirukan.

Mengapa saya dan majoriti berkata demikian??

  1. "God" jika diterjemaahkan secara terus bermaksud tuhan. Kenapa hendak juga ALLAH??
  2. Jika awak kata sejak zaman jahiliah lagi masyarakat arab baik dari Yahudi dan Nasrani menggunakan perkataan Allah walaupun sebelum Muhammad S.A.W., itu memang benar. Sebabnya mereka telah menerima ajaran Allah lebih awal  melalui Nabi Ibrahim A.S. dan Nabi Isa A.S. dan meraka kekal menggunakannya sehingga kehadiran Muhammad S.A.W. 
  3. Dan adakah anda ingin mereka kekal perkataan Allah SWT , walaupun mereka telah menyekutukan Allah?
  4. Jika mereka kristian percaya dan yakin dengan ajaran mereka, mengapa mereka ingin menggunakan perkataan Allah perkataan tuhan jelas paling sesuai digunakan menggantikan "god"?
Saya lebih sanggup untuk tidak menikmati semua janji Pakatan Rakyat dari saya membiarkan Anak Cucu saya tergelincir dari Tali Allah SWT.

Apalah makna kehidupan saya jika saya sanggup menyesatkan saudara saya hanya kerana beberapa janji yang menyenangi hidup duniawi ini.

Apalah makna aspirasi kita untuk menjadikan hukum Allah (Hudud) dibumi Malaysia ini sedangkan perkataan Allah kita tidak pertahankan. 

Saya juga tidak akan bersama UMNO. Perjuangan saya adalah apa yang selari dengan kehendak Islam dan tidak mensyirikkan Tuhan yang Esa (ALLAH).

Hayyu Zahari 
Ayer Keroh
18/02/2013



.

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Kuasa Politik

Akhir kini begitu banyak limpahan PRU lalu dapat dinikmati baik dari kerajaan persekutuan mahupun dari kerajaan negeri tidak terkecuali dari Kerajaan Barisan Nasional dan Pakatan Rakyat.

Baik dari pemberian BR1M, BB1M dan sebagainya dapat dirasai baik oleh pengundi BN dan PR. Begitu juga dengan air percuma, khairat kematian, wang ganjaran ke IPT dan lain-lain. Alhamdulillah syukur kerana adanya kesedaran politik, maka kerajaan yang mentadbir mula sedar bahawa rakyat harus mendapat sesuatu dari kekayaan negara dan negeri.

Jika dahulu ahli parlimen BN boleh ponteng ketika perbahasan sekarang tidak lagi, bahkan mereka mula peka terhadap setiap perbahasan dan mula mengambil bahagian dan membawa permasalah rakyat kesidang parlimen.

Kalau dahulu hanya kerajaan membentangkan bajet kewangan tetapi kini ahli parlimen pengimbang sudah juga mampu membentangkan bajet alternatif mereka. Ini melihatkan keseriusan mereka dalam mentadbir negara jika berlaku tsunami politik yang lebih besar maka secara automatik mereka telah bersedia untuk mengendong beban pentadbiran negara.

Apa yang lebih besar yang diinginkan ialah mengubah pemikiran ortodok bahawa hanya satu pemerintah yang mampu mentadbir negara. Kesedaran dan kefahaman bagaimana sistem pemilihan pentadbiran ini berjalan berserta fungsinya.

Kita melihat bagaimana kerajaan persekutuan dan negeri yang berbeza parti politik dapat menjalankan tanggungjawab masing-masing. Alangkah lebih baik kedua-dua parti politik ini berkerjasama dalam melakukan tanggungjawab yang wajib dipikul tanpa lagi mementingkan glamor politik.





Saturday, 20 October 2012

Memansuhkan PTPTN (Perbadanan Tabung Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional)


Pakatan Rakyat berjanji untuk memansuhkan PTPTN pendidikan kerana ia percaya bahawa ia adalah tanggungjawab kerajaan untuk menyediakan pendidikan tertiari percuma kepada semua rakyat Malaysia.

Pelajar pendidikan swasta akan menerima subsidi yuran.Sebagai pendidikan tertiari yang disediakan oleh kerajaan, ini akan meringankan beban bahawa pelajar  yang sedang menghadapi, apabila memasuki tenaga kerja sudah dengan hutang untuk membayar.

Pakatan Rakyat percaya bahawa model pembiayaan semasa melalui PTPTN tidak mampan.Ia hanya menunggu masa sebelum kerajaan persekutuan berakhir sehingga menyelamatkan PTPTN adalah kejadian yang biasa berlaku di negara-negara lain dengan model pembiayaan yang sama. Dengan upah dan gaji terus ketinggalan ketara di sebalik kos sara hidup, keupayaan majoriti peminjam untuk membayar balik pinjaman pelajar pada masa dan kerap  adalah terhad. Kadar koleksi tidak akan meningkat dengan ketara dari masa ke masa dan hutang pelajar yang ditanggung oleh PTPTN akan terus berkembang sehingga ia mula mengancam kecairan dan daya maju kewangan PTPTN.

Pakatan Rakyat yakin bahawa ia boleh  menghapuskan pinjaman untuk sebilangan besar peminjam yang memenuhi satu set kriteria tertentu (gabungan cara ekonomi ujian berdasarkan pendapatan semasa, keputusan akademik dan rekod terdahulu) akan ditentukan oleh jawatankuasa khasditugaskan untuk merombak keseluruhan mekanisme pembiayaan pendidikan tinggi di Malaysia. Jika anggaran RM30 bilion yang telah dikeluarkan setakat ini diambil alih oleh kerajaan persekutuan melalui pembiayaan semula, kami percaya obligasi hutang dapat dipenuhi pada kos RM2 bilion setahun bagi tempoh 20 tahun.

Ini akan meningkatkan pendapatan boleh guna peminjam yang terjejas dengan segera dan membolehkan dia / dia semula keutamaan / perbelanjaan beliau ke kawasan yang ketara boleh meningkatkan kualiti hidup.

Belanjawan Pakatan Rakyat 2013

Sunday, 22 July 2012

Bersediakah Kita

Masa berlalu terlalu pantas sehingga tidak kita sedari kemerdekaan sudah menjenggah usia 55 tahun. Cabaran era kita berbeza dengan era pra kemerdekaan dan cabaran ini yang menguji kesediaan kita.

Apa yang kita hadapi kini ialah cabaran sistem 'meritocracy' yang akan dilaksanakan secara meluas dalam semua bidang bagi menggalakkan persaingan terbuka tanpa membezakan hak keistimewaan seseorang. Ianya bertujuan untuk menjadikan modal insan lebih berdaya saing dan bersedia menghadapi cabaran global.

Namun demikian, tidak tahu mengapa ada kemungkinan pelaksanaan 'meritocracy' ini mungkin datangnya dari mereka-mereka yang ingin mengambil peluang untuk menghapuskan hak keistimewaan bangsa-bangsa tertentu dan menggunakan kesempatan ini bagi mencapai hasrat selama usia kemerdekaan kita.

Ada pula yang berpendapat, 'meritocracy' ini tidak lain adalah habuan balas kepada kemewahan pemimpin-pemimpin politik. Itulah harga yang harus dibayar oleh rakyat dek kejahilan pemimpin pilihan.

Namun begitu, terdapat juga asas-asas bahawa sistem 'meritocracy' ini harus didokong bagi mencapai matlamat negara bangsa. Sistem merit ini mampu dilaksanakan secara menyeluruh apabila beberapa syarat dilaksanakan:

  1. Sistem persekolah satu bumbung : Tiada lagi sekolah Melayu, Cina dan Tamil. Hanya yang wujud sekolah rakyat yang mana semua bangsa bersekolah di sekolah yang sama dengan 1 sistem pendidikan kebangsaan.
  2. Setiap pelajar harus menguasai setidak-tidak 3 bahasa sebelum memasuki pendidikan peringkat menengah iaitu bahasa malaysia, inggeris dan cina atau tamil atau kadazan atau iban atau punjabi atau mana-mana bahasa yang diajar dalam sistem sekolah rakyat. (Tidak termasuk bahasa arab)
  3. 70 peratus rakyat malaysia memahami setidak-tidak satu bahasa dari bangsa lain samada bahasa cina, tamil, iban, kadazan atau lain-lain termasuk kefasihan yang tinggi dalam bahasa kebangsaan.
  4. Ujian lisan bahasa malaysia wajib dimasukan sebagai permarkahan dalam Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM).
  5. Ujian kewarganegara dikenakan pada Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) dan SPM.
  6.  Temuduga kerja wajib dalam bahasa kebangsaan atau salah satu dari bahasa ditemuduga. 
Syarat-syarat di atas dikenakan kerana terdapat kelemahan yang jelas antaranya ketika sesi permohonan kerja dimana syarat menguasai bahasa selain bahasa kebangsaan menjadi kelebihan atau kewajipan. Contoh penguasaan dalam bahasa cina menjadi kelebihan dan hanya segelintir yang menguasainya selain bangsa cina kerana sistem dwi persekolahan yang ada pada peringkat nasional dan ini membuatkan sistem yang ada tidak setara dan persaingan tidak seimbang.


Sistem merit haruslah dilaksanakan apabila syarat-syarat diatas dipenuhi bagi membuka ruang yang adil dalam persaingan terbuka. 

Hayyu Zahari
22/07/2012

Saturday, 5 May 2012

BERSIH dari Persepsi Saya

Segala penulisan ini adalah untuk menyatakan pendirian saya secara peribadi berhubung dengan BERSIH dan menjawap segala persoalan rakan-rakan.

Pelbagai pandangan yang telah dilemparkan kepada POLIS, Pembangkang dan perserta demo dan sebagainya termasuk pengamal media. Juga tidak kurang rintihan dari anak-anak polis dan juga anak-anak peserta demo serta anak muda yang inginkan perubahan berlaku dalam sistem pentadbiran negara.

Saya ingin mulakan dengan kekecewaan saya terhadap pentadbiran negara yang telah rakus menggunakan segenap kuasa bagi menghalang lawan politik mereka. Mereka telah menggerakan rakyat melawan kebangkitan rakyat. Mereka menggunakan POLIS bagi menangkis kebangkitan rakyat. Mahkamah menjadi alat kepada mereka dalam menghadang kuasa yang kian terhakis oleh kesilapan mereka sendiri. Integriti dikorbankan dan amanah dicabuli serta media menjadi perkakas menyebarkan tuduhan palsu yang tidak laku.

Saya juga mempertahankan anggota POLIS yang berintegriti dan menjalankan tanggungjawap seperti mana yang diperuntukkan terhadap mereka. Saya juga ingin mengecam tindakan segelintir POLIS yang rakus menggunakan kuasa diluar batasan kuasa yang telah diperuntukkan dalam undang-undang negara. Mereka yang bertindak liar diluar batasan undang-undang apatah lagi agama.

Saya juga tidak mempertahankan bulat-bulat para peserta yang menyertai himpunan BERSIH. Walaupun  niat asal ingin menyatakan kepada kerajaan bahawa mereka inginkan segala tuntutan dipenuhi tetapi beberapa kerat peserta yang saya anggap lemah telah terpedaya dengan tipu muslihat musuh. Mereka terperangkap dengan rancangan yang direncana musuh untuk menjadikan perhimpunan itu menjadi buruk, mereka tidak sedar ada dikalangan mereka bukan benar-benar menyokong tuntutan BERSIH tetapi mereka datang sebagai pengacau untuk menjadikan BERSIH berimej KOTOR.

Kewujudan media yang tidak lagi menyampaikan berita atau agenda rakyat tetapi lebih senang untuk mereka menjadi PENYEDAP KERAJAAN. Adalah mereka telah lupakan tanggungjawap? Atau mereka tidak tahu betapa pentingnya mereka untuk menyampaikan yang benar? Atau terlalu bodohkah mereka untuk menilai tindakan mereka yang bakal mengucar-kacirkan negara kerana keenakkan menyampaikan berita palsu?

Pendirian saya tetap menyokong TUNTUTAN BERSIH dan cuma kaedah perhimpunan itu tidak saya setujui kerana membolehkan pihak tertentu mengambil kesempatan menggunakan kaedah SABOTAJ. Bagi pimpinan BERSIH, tidakkah mereka tahu bahawa jika dalam peperangan kita harus meneliti setiap strategi dan tidak membenarkan pihak lawan mengambil peluang diatas kelemahan kita sendiri. Mungkin anda melihat itu peluang tetapi sebenarnya mendatangkan kesan dari segi imej dan mungkin anda ingin melihat multiple impact dari HIMPUNAN BERSIH.Adakah wujud kesempatan anda untuk menentang fitnah melalui media dalam lingkungan masa kurang dari 2 bulan menjelang PRU-13?

Hayyu Zahari
Ayer Keroh
5/5/2012







Wednesday, 25 April 2012

Siswa dihina kerana PTPTN

Mahasiswa terus dihina dan diserang kerana mendesak kerajaan memansuhkan PTPTN. Mereka yang menyerang siswa ini dikalangan kaki ampu yang tidak langsung mampu mempertahankan kerajaan melalui hujah.

Si kaki ampu hanya mampu menyerang dengan beberapa kerat ayat yang tidak langsung mampu dikembangkan sebagai hujah orang berilmu. Mereka menghina mahasiswa kerana enggan membayar hutang setelah meminjam sedangkan mahasiswa ditawarkan PTPTN dimansuhkan oleh pihak PR serta pendidikan percuma yang ditanggung oleh mereka jika memerintah. 

Jika ini tampak janji kosong tetapi mereka membekalkan dengan segala maklumat yang lengkap bagaimana mereka mampu memansuhkan PTPTN dan membiayai segala hutang yang diambilalih dari mahasiswa sejak 1997.

Saya mempertahankan tindakan mahasiswa mendesak kerajaan untuk memansuhkan PTPTN kerana:

  1. Menjadi tanggungjawab kerajaan menyediakan pendidikan secara percuma seperti mana dahulu sebelum wujudnya PTPTN.
  2. Kerajaan mempunyai sumber kewangan yang mencukupi bagi menanggung kos pembiayaan mahasiswa termasuk IPTA, IPTS dan Politeknik.
  3. PTPTN yang diperkenalkan bertujuan untuk mengaut keuntungan bukan bertujuan untuk membantu mahasiswa.
  4. Dengan memperkenalkan PTPTN kerajaan dapat memberi kekayaan kepada kroni  yang terlibat dalam mengusahakan industri pendidikan atau IPTS.
Kerajaan harus membuktikan bahawa mereka tidak mampu untuk memansuhkan PTPTN dengan melampirkan pecahan perbelanjaan negara secara penuh dan lengkap.

Jika kerajaan tidak mampu memansuhkan PTPTN, ini bermaksud dakwaan PR benar bahawa kerajaan gagal menguruskan kewangan negara kerana hampir mencapai hutang kritikal sekitar 55 % dari KDNK negara.

Kerajaan juga berbohong kepada rakyat dengan mendakwa KDNK negara meningkat hampir sekali ganda menurut PM. Jika dakwaan kerajaan benar, maka tiada menjadi masalah atau alasan untuk tidak memansuhkan hutang PTPTN. Jika sebaliknya berlaku, kerajaan harus berundur kerana membohongi rakyat.

Mahasiswa juga bertegas bahawa kami menyokong rancangan pengambilalihan hutang PTPTN dari bahu kami kepada tanggungan kerajaan seperti mana yang dicadangkan oleh pihak PR. 

Kerajaan diminta berundur jika tidak  berkemampuan dalam mengurus dan meringankan bebanan rakyat serta dalam masa yang sama melangsaikan hutang yang ditanggung selama ini atas kelemahan perancangan ekonomi.

Kerajaan digesa tidak melakukan penipuan dalam sistem Pilihan Raya seperti yang dilakukan di Melaka dengan mengubah alamat pengundi ke kawasan tertentu dengan kerja sama Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara. Apa yang menyedihkan ianya melibatkan mahasiswa  yang juga anak ADUN dari kerajaan dalam melakukan konspirasi politik yang bertujuan mencabuli sistem pilihan raya negara.

Hayyu Zahari
25/04/2012
Ayer Keroh

 


Wednesday, 18 April 2012

PTPTN dan tanggungjawab.

  1. Soal PTPTN menjadi begitu penting kebelakangan ini, biar ia diterima atau ditentang haruskedua-duanya berpaksikan kebenaran berserta hujah kukuh.
  2. Soal pendidikan di Malaysia ianya menjadi tanggungjawab kerajaan pusat dan kerana itu isu PTPTN harus dibahaskan dalam lingkaran yang bersangkut dengan tanggungjawab Persekutuan.
  3.  PTPTN diperkenalkan oleh Kerajaan sekitar 1997 bagi membuka peluang perniagaan pendidikan dengan tertubuhnya banyak IPTS swasta sejak PTPTN diperkenalkan.
  4. Soal hutang harus dibayar menjadi asas penting dalam isu PTPTN. Ramai berpendapat PTPTN ini disokong oleh kalangan mereka yang liat untuk membayar hutang dan tidak kurang pula yang penyokong PTPTN ini dipandang tidak lain boneka kerajaan. Walau bagaimana pun pandangan kedua-dua ini  harus mengemuka hujah kukuh mengapa mereka menyokong pihak-pihak ini dan bukan berdiri kosong tanpa tujuan.
  5. Benar hutang harus dibayar kerana itu ketetapannya, baik dari segi norma manusia dan juga pegangan agama. Namun begitu, dirujuk kembali kepada asas pembangunan negara, pendidikan merupakan asas pembinaan modal insan untuk pembangunan negara, maka pelaburan dalam pendidikan merupakan pelaburan dalam pembinaan negara.
  6. Apabila timbul soal pendidikan percuma, ianya bukan terhad kepada sektor pengajian tinggi bahkan bermula dari zaman pra-sekolah ke phD.
  7. Soal yang timbul mengapakah kerajaan menyerahkan tanggungjawab pembiayaan pendidikan tadi menjadi tanggungjawab rakyat sedangkan ianya telah menjadi tanggungjawab kerajaan sejak zaman kolonial lagi.
  8. Kita tahu perolehan negara dan ekonomi baik, maka mengapa harus kita membebankan rakyat untuk berhutang untuk pendidikan.
  9. Jumlah wang yang harus dibelanjakan untuk memastikan pendidikan tinggi negara percuma hanya sekitar RM 6 billion setahun dengan kadar peningkatan sekitar 3-5 % setahun. Jumlah ini terlalu kecil jika untuk dibelanjakan kepada rakyat seramai 500,000 orang. Sedangkan penyelesaian pampasan diluar mahkamah untuk Tan Sri Tajuddin melebihi RM 600 juta untuk seorang.
  10. Baru-baru ini PM umumkan KDNK negara meningkat hampir sekali ganda, itu menunjukkan kerajaan mampu untuk mansuh PTPTN dan harus mengambil kembali tanggungjawab pendidikan tinggi negara.
  11. Jika tidak kerana ada pihak bawa isu PTPTN ini, tidaklah beriya Pemuda UMNO mencadangkan 1% kos PTPTN dimansuhkan. Siapa yang dapat manfaat? Rakyatkan!
  12. Kita harus bijak, tidak perlu sampai jadi pakar ekonomi. Kita lihat isu asas dari 3% nak jadi 1% pun kita kena isi macam-macam borang. Tapi pihak yang satu ini tawar tidak perlu pun isi borang untuk mansuhkan PTPTN tetapi kena menang Putrajaya-lah.
  13. Orang pun kata ini semua politik nak menang, itu memang betul dan benar. Kalau tidak BR1M dan pelbagai lagi pun tidak beri,  jika tidak sebab nak menang punya pasal termasuklah air percuma. Tapi asasnya perlu ada perbandingan, yang mana boleh beri kebaikan dalam masa yang sama kita harus melawan penyelewengan. Jangan bila kita dapat terus tutup mata tentang penyelewengan.
  14. Kuasa untuk mansuhkan PTPTN bukan ditangan pak menteri atau PM, tetapi ditangan kita  pengundi. Jika kita nak PTPTN mansuh, kita pilih yang nak beri pemansuhan. Jika mereka menang dan mansuh PTPTN tapi buat juga penyelewengan kita tukar kerajaan lain.Mudah-kan?
  15. PM bagi kata dua, mansuh PTPTN tapi cukai akan dinaikkan. Sah-sah rakyat tidak mahu cukai dinaikkan. Mahu pilih PM ini?
  16. Team 1 lagi tawar PTPTN free dan pendidikan semua peringkat free. Tidak kata naik apa-apa pun termasuk cukai. Dia kata duit negara cukup untuk buat semua itu. Jadi macam mana dengan anda? Mana nak pilih?
  17. Jadilah bijak untuk memilih, pandang dari segenap sudut dan bukan tuli penyokong. Rakyat yang bijak, Memilih Pemimpin yang Bijak. Rakyat yang rasuah, Pilihnya pemimpin yang rasuah.

Anda dialu-alukan memberi komen dan pandangan. Pihak saya juga sedia berdiskusi sama ada melalui perdebatan dan perbincangan secara terus. Apa yang dilakukan adalah untuk manfaat bersama dan terutama rakyat Malaysia.

Hayyu Zahari
       Ayer Keroh
       18/4/2012

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Mengapa tidak PTPTN !!

Kerajaan mampu untuk meLUPUSkan PTPTN jika menguruskan kewangan kerajaan melalui beberapa kaedah. Tetapi rakyat juga harus tahu berapakah tanggungan kerajaan jika PTPTN dilupuskan secara total.
  • Sehingga 2012 hutang PTPTN termasuk dengan faedah yang dikenakan sejak diperkenalkan dari tahun 1997-2012 ialah sekitar RM 43 billion.
  • Setiap tahun kira-kira 200,000 peminjam baru akan membuat pinjaman baru dan mereka terdiri dari pelajar IPTA, IPTS dan Politeknik.
  • Perbelanjaan tahunan kira-kira RM 6 billion setahun dan kadar peningkatan sekitar 3-4 peratus.
  • Perbelanjaan ini tidak termasuk biasiswa yang ditanggung oleh kerajaan.
Kerajaan mempunyai pilihan untuk melupuskan hutang PTPTN kerana beberapa faktor kecuaian yang telah mereka laksanakan dalam beberapa kes besar negara. Antaranya:
  • Penswastaan MAS yang menyebabkan kerajaan kerugian  berbillion ringgit.
  • Kes PERWAJA steel kerajaan rugi lebih dari RM 10 billion.
  • PKFZ kerajaan rugi berbillion.
  •  NFC kerajaan beri  RM 250 Juta.
  •  Penjualan PROTON juga kerajaan rugi berbillion ringgit.
  • Berbillion untuk kapal selam.
Tetapi bila rakyat (mahasiswa) berkeinginan pendidikan tinggi percuma dengan memansuhkan PTPTN." Tidak boleh, kerajaan akan bankrap",kata kerajaan. Jika dihimpun dengan segala ketirisan bukan sahaja kerajaan mampu untuk memansuhkan PTPTN bahkan jika tidak silap perkiraan kerajaan juga mampu untuk memberi air percuma kepada setiap rumah. 

Soalnya, bukan negara tidak mempunyai kemampuan kewangan untuk menanggung pendidikan percuma tetapi wang negara banyak yang bocor disebabkan oleh pengurusan yang lemah, tidak amanah dan tidak cekap.
  1. Kita minta kerajaan jawap mengapa PTPTN tidak mampu dilupuskan dengan sokongan hujah kukuh dan data yang jelas.
  2. Mengapa kita tidak memiliki kewangan yang cukup untuk melaksanakan agenda rakyat. 
  3. Mengapa kita harus tanggung kerugian dari penswastaan agensi kerajaan sejak diperkenalkan ketika era Mahathir.
  4. Kerajaan juga harus menjawap, mengapa segala kerugian diatas berlaku dan mengapa tindakan tidak diambil keatas sesetengah dari mereka.

Hayyu Zahari
Simpang Empat
11/04/2012